CLAT Legal Reasoning (Principle-Fact): In 'Law of Torts: Negligence, Duty of Care, Volenti Non Fit Injuria and Strict/Absolute Liability':
Principle: Volenti non fit injuria — Harm suffered voluntarily does not constitute a legal injury.
Facts: A spectator attends a premier cricket match. A batsman hits a legitimate six into the stands, striking the spectator on the shoulder. The spectator sues the stadium management for negligence. Is the stadium management liable?
Law Entrance - Legal Reasoning & Aptitude
Substantive Law, Legal Principles & Maxims question bank (Constitutional Law, Torts & Criminal Jurisprudence)
Practice 659 free Law Entrance - Legal Reasoning & Aptitude Constitutional Law, Torts & Criminal Jurisprudence - Substantive Law, Legal Principles & Maxims questions with answers and step-by-step solutions.
Q1.
Verified Answer & Solution Locked
Sign in to your free student account to reveal verified answers, instant hints, and detailed explanations.
Q2.
Legal Maxims: What is the accurate translation and judicial significance of the Latin maxim 'Audi Alteram Partem' in 'Law of Torts: Negligence, Duty of Care, Volenti Non Fit Injuria and Strict/Absolute Liability'?
Show answer & solution
Verified Answer & Solution Locked
Sign in to your free student account to reveal verified answers, instant hints, and detailed explanations.
Protected Questions
Unlock All 659 Questions in Substantive Law, Legal Principles & Maxims
Log in or sign up free to access every question with complete solutions, create chapter practice tests, and track your performance.
Sign up free to access all 659 questions
Unlock every Substantive Law, Legal Principles & Maxims question, generate papers, and practice at your own pace.